What Affirmative Action Was Overturned
What Affirmative Action Was Overturned
On June 29, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to overturn affirmative action in college admissions. The case, _Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin_, challenged the University of Texas’s use of race as a factor in admissions. The Court found that the university’s admissions policy did not meet the strict scrutiny standard required for race-based classifications.
This decision overturned a 45-year precedent set by the Court in the 1978 case, _Regents of the University of California v. Bakke_. In _Bakke_, the Court upheld the use of race as a factor in admissions, but only as one of many factors. The Court found that race could be used to achieve diversity in the student body, but only if it was done in a narrowly tailored way.
The _Fisher_ decision effectively ends affirmative action in college admissions nationwide. Colleges and universities that have relied on race as a factor in admissions will now have to find other ways to achieve diversity. This could lead to a decrease in minority enrollment at these schools.
The _Fisher_ decision is a major victory for opponents of affirmative action. These opponents argue that affirmative action is a form of reverse discrimination that unfairly disadvantages white applicants. They also argue that affirmative action is unnecessary, as there is no longer any significant racial discrimination in college admissions.
Supporters of affirmative action argue that it is a necessary tool to achieve diversity in the student body. They argue that diversity is important for educational purposes, as it exposes students to different perspectives and experiences. They also argue that affirmative action helps to level the playing field for minority students who have been historically disadvantaged.
The _Fisher_ decision is a significant setback for affirmative action, but it is not the end of the story. It is possible that the Court will revisit the issue in the future, or that Congress will pass legislation to codify affirmative action. In the meantime, colleges and universities will have to find new ways to achieve diversity in their student bodies.
Here are some of the potential impacts of the _Fisher_ decision
* Decreased minority enrollment at colleges and universities.
* Increased legal challenges to affirmative action policies.
* Increased political polarization on the issue of affirmative action.
* New approaches to achieving diversity in the student body, such as socioeconomic affirmative action.
The _Fisher_ decision is a complex issue with far-reaching implications. It will be interesting to see how the decision is implemented and what the long-term impacts are.
Sure. Here is a more detailed explanation of what affirmative action was overturned
Affirmative action is a policy that aims to increase opportunities for historically disadvantaged groups. It has been used in a variety of contexts, including college admissions, employment, and government contracting.
In the case of college admissions, affirmative action policies have allowed colleges to consider race as one factor among many in the admissions process. This has helped to increase the number of minority students attending college, which has been shown to have a number of benefits for both students and society as a whole.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin effectively overturned affirmative action in college admissions. The Court found that the University of Texas’s admissions policy did not meet the strict scrutiny standard required for race-based classifications.
Strict scrutiny is the highest level of judicial review that is applied to laws that discriminate on the basis of race. In order to pass strict scrutiny, a law must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest.
The Court found that the University of Texas’s admissions policy was not narrowly tailored. The Court argued that the university could have achieved its goal of diversity by using other, race-neutral means, such as considering socioeconomic factors or geographic diversity.
The Court’s decision in Fisher is a major setback for affirmative action. It is likely to lead to a decrease in minority enrollment at colleges and universities. It is also likely to increase legal challenges to affirmative action policies.
The decision is also a sign of the times. The Supreme Court is now dominated by conservatives, who are generally opposed to affirmative action. It is likely that the Court will continue to chip away at affirmative action in the years to come.
The overturning of affirmative action is a significant event with far-reaching implications. It is a setback for racial equality and it is likely to have a negative impact on minority students. It is also a sign of the changing political landscape in the United States.
Post a Comment